This section is showing information that is up to date as of the end of the 2025-26 NCAA Basketball season. To join our email list and get notified when we launch the 2026-27 NCAA Basketball section, register for a free account.

Charleston So at UT Martin: Matchup Stats

Tuesday Dec 2, 2025 12:00 pm - Martin, TN
Odds: UT Martin by 3, Total Points: 147.5

More Games From Dec 2, 2025

Charleston So vs UT Martin Overall

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Points/Game 80.9 (#44) 64.7 (#5) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin 0.0 (#180) -3.1 (#101) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 15.7 (#57) 11.9 (#49) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 40.4 (#9) 34.1 (#132) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.549 (#116) 0.534 (#212) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 1.129 (#219) 0.897 (#23) Opp Assists/Turnover

UT Martin vs Charleston So Overall

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Points/Game 67.8 (#319) 81.0 (#331) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin +3.1 (#101) 0.0 (#180) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 12.9 (#220) 10.6 (#10) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 38.0 (#42) 39.8 (#356) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.562 (#85) 0.391 (#3) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 0.911 (#323) 1.108 (#121) Opp Assists/Turnover

Charleston So vs UT Martin Shooting

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Effective FG % 54.1% (#66) 46.1% (#11) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.305 (#296) 0.358 (#207) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 64.8% (#360) 68.7% (#16) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 35.6% (#78) 30.2% (#9) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 54.6% (#68) 46.7% (#23) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 45.2% (#140) 40.2% (#14) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 1.113 (#137) 1.001 (#10) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 28.6 (#35) 22.2 (#6) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 63.3 (#14) 55.3 (#58) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 11.2 (#6) 6.6 (#44) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 31.3 (#8) 21.9 (#127) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 12.5 (#308) 13.6 (#102) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 19.3 (#228) 19.8 (#148) Opp FTA/Game

UT Martin vs Charleston So Shooting

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Effective FG % 48.7% (#297) 46.9% (#21) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.374 (#118) 0.427 (#335) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 67.7% (#330) 70.7% (#77) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 30.3% (#337) 31.6% (#50) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 51.5% (#189) 46.6% (#20) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 41.6% (#322) 41.9% (#42) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 1.040 (#307) 1.043 (#48) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 23.0 (#335) 27.1 (#266) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 55.3 (#315) 64.8 (#358) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 7.9 (#161) 6.4 (#30) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 26.0 (#73) 20.3 (#62) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 14.0 (#221) 19.5 (#359) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 20.7 (#171) 27.6 (#361) Opp FTA/Game

Charleston So vs UT Martin Scoring

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
1st Half Pts/Gm 37.2 (#78) 32.3 (#55) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 42.2 (#48) 32.1 (#2) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm 1.5 (#40) 0.3 (#113) Opp OT Pts/Gm

UT Martin vs Charleston So Scoring

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
1st Half Pts/Gm 31.0 (#324) 37.2 (#287) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 36.6 (#288) 41.4 (#295) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm 0.2 (#283) 2.4 (#359) Opp OT Pts/Gm

Charleston So vs UT Martin Rebounding

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Off Rebounds/Gm 9.3 (#142) 10.0 (#308) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 26.2 (#11) 20.8 (#57) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 28.1% (#195) 29.9% (#251) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 72.6% (#137) 64.3% (#16) Opp Def Rebound %

UT Martin vs Charleston So Rebounding

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Off Rebounds/Gm 11.5 (#11) 9.9 (#299) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 23.4 (#100) 23.9 (#291) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 35.7% (#16) 27.4% (#137) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 70.1% (#251) 71.9% (#195) Opp Def Rebound %

Charleston So vs UT Martin Blocks

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Blocks/Game 4.9 (#21) 3.2 (#159) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 7.6% (#38) 5.8% (#202) Opp Block %

UT Martin vs Charleston So Blocks

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Blocks/Game 4.1 (#64) 3.2 (#165) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 7.4% (#42) 5.1% (#94) Opp Block %

Charleston So vs UT Martin Steals

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Steals/Game 4.9 (#339) 8.7 (#359) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 5.6% (#356) 10.9% (#360) Opp Steals/Play

UT Martin vs Charleston So Steals

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Steals/Game 8.3 (#26) 8.0 (#336) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 10.7% (#18) 9.2% (#291) Opp Steals/Play

Charleston So vs UT Martin Turnovers

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Turnovers/Game 13.9 (#346) 13.2 (#52) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 16.1% (#298) 17.0% (#30) Opp Turnovers/Play

UT Martin vs Charleston So Turnovers

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Turnovers/Game 14.2 (#350) 9.6 (#333) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 17.8% (#354) 11.0% (#360) Opp Turnovers/Play

Charleston So vs UT Martin Fouls

CHSO Value (rank) Value (rank) UTM
Personal Fouls/Gm 22.2 (#365) 17.6 (#167) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 25.5% (#352) 22.1% (#167) Opp Personal Fouls/Play

UT Martin vs Charleston So Fouls

UTM Value (rank) Value (rank) CHSO
Personal Fouls/Gm 17.2 (#154) 17.4 (#178) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 22.1% (#176) 20.1% (#320) Opp Personal Fouls/Play